5 Wonders: Will Tony Romo's sacks increase?

Messages
4,604
Reaction score
2
5 Wonders: Will Tony Romo's sacks increase?
October, 4, 2012
By Todd Archer | ESPNDallas.com

IRVING, Texas -- If you were wondering where Five Wonders was this week, we just pushed it back a little because of the bye.

With no further ado, we give you the wonders:

** After Monday's debacle, Tony Romo pledged to "do his job" and not try to do too much in the future. I wonder why it takes games like Monday's (and last year's against Detroit) for Romo to come to realization, but I wonder more about what it means going forward. Here's what I think (or wonder): He will take more sacks. And that's a good thing, believe it or not. Too many of us want to just kill last year's offensive line by always bringing up the career-high 36 times Romo was sacked in 2011. In the first four games last year, he was sacked seven times. Quick math says he was sacked 29 in the final 12 games. He went from getting sacked 1.8 times per game to 2.4 times a game. And he had his best season. There's a health risk to taking sacks obviously, but there's something also about living to fight another day. Twice Romo has climbed the pocket in as many weeks and looked to flip the ball forward and twice he's fumbled. Both times, the Cowboys were in field goal range. Last year Romo showed he could still be Romo, meaning make plays when things break down, but he could do it in a somewhat controlled fashion. I wonder if he goes back to that way of thinking.

** Jason Garrett has been calling plays here since 2007. Generally I think the reaction to playcalling is completely overrated because all anyone says is, 'How can you call that play?' when it doesn't work. It's a second guesser's dream. I wonder if Garrett should allow offensive coordinator Bill Callahan to take a crack at it a few times in games. Garrett talks about the collaborative effort there is during the week in coming up with a plan and how that is factored into the playcalling. Well, when you've scored 65 points in four games, you can't just keep doing the same thing over and over, can you? It's not unheard of for playcallers to do this. Bill Parcells let Sean Payton and Tony Sparano take turns when they were with the Cowboys. Callahan has called plays before. I say this and should point out the Cowboys have had a ton of drops, too many penalties and missed throws. But sometimes, a fresh voice can just break things up.

** Jay Ratliff will make his return when the Cowboys play at Baltimore next week. I wonder how much of a difference he will make. The run defense has been decent if not spectacular, but that's not where Ratliff is at his best anyway. Where he needs to help most is in the pass game, although his sack totals have decreased in each of the last four seasons. DeMarcus Ware will get sacks if you and I are playing alongside him, but Ratliff's influence could help Anthony Spencer, Jason Hatcher and Sean Lee. Ratliff is so active that he occupies the attention of multiple blockers more than a Sean Lissemore or a Hatcher. It doesn't mean he will get a ton of sacks, but his presence could help others get sacks. Just something else to note about Ratliff: He showed up at training camp last year weighing 285 pounds. A lot was made of it and he wasn't happy about it. His official playing weight this year is 303 pounds. Maybe it's a coincidence, maybe it's because he was not able to do any on-field work in the offseason. Or maybe they wanted him to be a little bigger.

**The Cowboys signed Brodney Pool early in the free-agency process. They gave him only $100,000 to sign and a $1 million base salary, and, yes, I realize we all should be so fortunate to get that kind of signing bonus when I say "only." Pool was viewed as a stopgap with the hopes the team would draft somebody as a longer-term answer. Unfortunately, Pool didn't seem so interested in playing football. I wonder if the team needs to stop listening to the coaches when it comes to them wanting guys they used to coach. Rob Ryan coached Pool in Cleveland and by the time the Cowboys cut Pool a week into training camp, Ryan said Pool wasn't the same guy he coached. But here's the problem with the Pool miss: It took them out of the running of keeping Abe Elam, who wasn't great but was certainly better than Pool and could have been the same stopgap guy while allowing Barry Church to be the starter, or another veteran-type safety more willing to want to play. Elam ended up in Kansas City. Church's Achilles injury, combined with Matt Johnson's hamstring issues, have left the Cowboys thin at safety for the rest of the season. And for a bonus wonder, no, I don't wonder if the Cowboys will look in the trade market for a veteran safety.

**The Cowboys are on pace for 12 takeaways this season. Chicago already has 14. Atlanta has 12. New England has 11. Arizona has 10. The Cowboys have a Lee interception and fumble recoveries from Church and Victor Butler. I wonder why the Cowboys just can't seem to take the ball away from the other team. They practice it over and over. The coaches emphasize it in drills. And it rarely happens. The generalization is that turnovers come in bunches. Once you get one, it becomes a feeding frenzy. In the first 10 games last year, the Cowboys had 23 takeaways, including four against New England and Buffalo each. In the last 10 games, the Cowboys have seven takeaways and have not had a multiple takeaway game during that span.
 
Messages
3,665
Reaction score
23
I wonder if the team needs to stop listening to the coaches when it comes to them wanting guys they used to coach.

Coaches should give advice about players they know ... that's an important function. But the advice should be accurate. Ryan needs to give better advice, not less advice.
 
Messages
10,636
Reaction score
0
That's where people went too far in defending romo. On that flip play the pressure was from his right side, he should've seen it and avoided the big mistake. Plus witten wasn't going anywhere with the ball anyway.


But our offense has a serious problem in that every big play is off some improvised flukey shit. You play with fire that much it's bound to burn you eventually
 
Messages
3,665
Reaction score
23
That's where people went too far in defending romo. On that flip play the pressure was from his right side, he should've seen it and avoided the big mistake. Plus witten wasn't going anywhere with the ball anyway.


But our offense has a serious problem in that every big play is off some improvised flukey shit. You play with fire that much it's bound to burn you eventually

I agree that there is an over-reliance on flukey improv.

The offense asks too much of Romo. So much so that Romo can't play within himself; he's forced to play on the outside edge of ability. Resulting in too many high risk plays that eventually result in turnovers.

Most of Romo's turnovers last Monday night were caused by other players not executing properly, but a couple were due to Romo pressing.
 

ThoughtExperiment

Quality Starter
Messages
9,906
Reaction score
8
On the little Cowboys spot that runs on Fox SW, Spagnola showed a pretty convincing shot endzone view that Tony got that ball knocked out as a fumble and wasn't trying to pitch it forward. It looked like Witten was way beyond where Tony could have gotten it to him.

Anyway, if Tony is determined to be more careful with the ball, instead of more sacks, you'd hope Tony would be quicker to just throw the ball away.
 
Top Bottom