Search results

You right, crack does kill. In your case, crack would be doing us a favor. You have serious reading comprehension problems. Where did I ever say that Huock decided which QB to play? PAY ATTENTION! I imagine Huock had something to do with Kowalski not supplanting Costa in the starting...

Plenty. And Huock was not around when Romo was here. My point was, that just like Kowalski had to sit behind and inferior player, Romo also had to in the above named QBs. That's always been the culture here.

Blame that on Huock, and he's no longer here. How long did Romo havbe to wait behind the likes of Carter, Testaverde, Hutchinson, and Henson?

I'm all for bringing in Nicks. And for drafting DeCastro. Nicks, Kowalski, and DeCastro would make for a far better interior than Nicks, Konz, and Arkin, Nagy, Kosier, Dockery, or whomever.

How can you appreciate it when you haven't watched him? You're full of shit. Nobody is ignoring it. Going with Kowalski would not be ignoring the position or winging it, the guy has proven himself more than capable thus far---enough to warrant the start, and where we can focus on other...

Underwhelming. DeCastro is the better prospect. DeCastro and Branch or DeCastro and the other pass rusher cmd raves about, or a CB would be better. Sorry, but Kowalski is a better Center than either Arkin, Nagy, and Kosier at Guard. And DeCastro is a better guard than Konz and Jones are at...

Well why would that stop her? She hasn't watched Kowalski either and yet felt inclined to offer up a very extensive opinion.

Weren't you the one screaming about how the defense is so bad? So who do you spend the 1st on?

With you not seeing any of those 144 snaps, so there is no merit at all. But it's not just a 144 snaps. It's 144 snaps WITHOUT a QB pressure.

It doesn't defy logic. What defies logic is focusing on a persons draft status as opposed to their actual playing. Kowalski played above his UFDA status, but you wouldn't know this because YOU have not watched him. Offering an opinion up on a player because of their UFDA status and NOT from...

And he sucked in those games. Just because he started does not mean he was any good. Carter and Testaverde both started. Bottomline what it comes down to is having DeCastro at one guard and Kowalski at Center OR Konz at Center and either Nagy, Arkin, or Kosier at guard. DeCastro is a better...

He did? What was so GREAT about him in his lone start? What stands out? His lone start was against the Dolphins on Thanksgiving Day in 2003. The Cowboys lost 40-21. That RT position was a revolving door all year with mainly Ryan Young and Kurt Vollers. Interesting when Tucker was in the staring...

Sure you did. You brought up how Free sucked and appended to Kowalski, optherwise why even bring up Free at all? And Kowalski is only an unknown to you because you haven't watched him. We have other positions of importance than to be hedging. Sometimes you got to bite the bullet, like they did...

Well gee... we do have the #14 pick? Pay attention. LOL. And how do you know Kowalski would not be just fine, especially when you haven't watched him? You're certain that he will fail because of his... "connection with Free". Nobody said anything about handing him the start. He doesn't have to...

Nobody is talking about Costa. But thanks for stating the obvious.

And we shouldn't. Not when we have greater needs. Kowalski would be just fine between DeCastro and Nicks if we were to acquire both. Sorry, Center is not the most important need on this team as of now. Not even for the interior. It'd be a wasted pick because of it being a major reach at 14...

But you are all gung-ho on giving the start to Konz. You have no arguement on this topic, because it's evident tha tyou have not watched Kowalski. So what. Free HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH Kowlaski. No matter the number of snaps. They are two different individuals. Just because Free sucked last...

No bitch. It just suggests that he's warrants more of a look and more opportunities. But those 144 snaps are more than what Konz has. It's all about the name with you. Once again, proves my point that you haven't watched him. Go back to cheerleading and leave the real football talk to us men...

Oh well, you're not completely satisfied. Well why didn't you say so. That's what the draft strategy needs to be: pure and complete satisfaction by EC. Fact is, I don't think you've watched Kowalski. I'm not saying he's all-world, but the guy has been excellant in the limited opportuniteis he's...

Because we have other needs. You don't draft somebody high just for the sake of providing competition. If Konz is drafted then he will be GIVEN the starting Center job, as you seem to be decrying. If DeCastro is drafted, you don't think the starting job will be HANDED to him?