Search results

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/33231841/dallas-cowboys-paid-24-million-settle-cheerleaders-voyeurism-allegations

Sounds like plenty of people around the league think the same thing some of us do- that we blew a golden opportunity this year. And after seeing/hearing how this postseason played out, its hard for anyone to really argue against that. The Rams and Bengals were both painfully mediocre teams...

But THATS DIFFERENT

This needs to be duplicated almost all over the country in every public school district. And if it can happen in a place as liberal and extreme as San Francisco, that pretty much says all that needs to be said. These three fucktards wholeheartedly deserved this.

Hope Baldwin rots in prison

Key sentence there "had thought about hiring him IF Landry ever decided to retire" Like I said, had Jones not bought the team I doubt Jimmy ever ended up as HC here, and thus we'd have almost assuredly never won those 3 super bowls. Schramm would have probably needed to see another 2 or 3 train...

Not really sure I am buying this.

Oh gee shit Dooms, you mean when one team holds the other team to less points that team will win? Is the Rams defense good or is the Bungles OL just lousy? I mean they did just allow 70 sacks for the season (counting the postseason, in which they gave up 19 in 4 games) My point went right over...

Rams and Bengals defenses ranked 17th and 18th in yds per game allowed, 15th and 17th in pts per game allowed. Only 1 of the top-10 teams in total defense made the conference championship, only 2 of the top-10 scoring defenses made the conference championship. Rams and Bengals offenses...

What a fucking ignorant bitch

Great defense or just lousy OL play? Those teams combined for 8 games in the postseason, and either could have lost any of the 4 they played. Welcome to the world of mediocrity. Neither one of those teams was all that good.

This doesnt say anything about Shramm hiring Jimmy (or having anything to do with it) either. The only thing I vaguely recall is Schramm was hoping to have Landry hand off the team to Paul Hackett a year or two after he was hired to implement his offensive scheme...

Yeah to me too. I dont remember it and when I googled it, I can't find anything about it either. I did find this article from the Chicago Trubune: https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-1989-04-18-8904110575-story.html

According to the box score, the team that got the most turnovers and did the better job stopping the run (stuffing the run appears to be a better description, as the Rams averaged 2 yds per carry) LOST the game. Also, you made a comment about the Bungles just ceasing to run the ball, yet...

And apparently Ramsey got away with an obvious one that cost the Bungles points. And then there was that disgraceful call at the end of the game handing the Rams another first down after a 3rd down incompletion near the GL

As noted previously, I didn't watch the game but read a little about it and watched a few clips. One of my friends had money on the game (the over) and from what I gathered: 1) It was an incredibly ho-hum game between two completely underwhelming teams 2) Stafford offset some turnovers with a...