Search results

Spot on Al. Something tells me I should have taken your advice and just ignored him.

So you know when he caught it? Please let us know.

You need to see who his lawyers are and educate yourself. They are accomplished people and at the top of their profession. This is a completely idiotic statement. Can you name any of his lawyers or did you just make this statement up in a mental vacuum.....?

I'll ask you again to prove my quote wrong. You posted a link to the NYT. I'm not going to subscribe to read the link and I'd bet you didn't either. But, from what was available to read, here's what it says: "A team of New York Times reporters has pored over this information to assemble the...

Welcome and great post. I thought the same thing in terms of standards for print media but you nailed it. By the way, that dolt is stupid. You'll actually get dumber debating him because you've got to get down low and stupid to process his idiocy.

The NT Times is protected more by case law (NY Times vs Sullivan) than anything their high priced attorneys do. Plaintiffs must actually prove “actual malice.” In other words, the story can be completely wrong but you actually have to prove malice and that the person writing the story knew it...

Judge orders jury trial in Palin libel suit against The New York Times https://www.politico.com/news/2020/08/29/sarah-palin-libel-new-york-times-404810 "The initial version of the 2017 Times editorial said it was “clear” that the 2011 shooting was linked to a map Palin’s political action...

Could very well be the case Scott. He's probably thinking that he takes questions every day and feels he's ready. I also fully expect Biden to give us the talk track he's memorized during his 47 years in government. He has all the lines, the buzz words, the catchy phrases, etc. that he's...

This is the article I was referring to. It's short but, in essence, the NYT claim that Trump inherited 400 plus million is a figure based on today's valuation of his inheritance. Kind of misleading. But again, I take nothing away from your post. On the contrary, I appreciate the fact that...

No issue with you at all Yimmy. Your points are possible and they're reasoned.

With the exception of the previous post, everything you posted could absolutely have merit. I do think he had some leverage fucking the banks that loaned him his casino money but I doubt they're still involved in his other buildings. But I've been fucked by banks enough to not really give to...

This has already been debunked. Number 1 or whatever his user name is made the same claim and we went back and forth for a while. I'll dig it up if I actually have time only because I provided link(s) to the reporting. I'm not going to lie. The fact that you and that dickhead think alike is...

And I'll say this.....do I think folks should release their tax returns? Yes. But I also believe that Trump knows nothing good can come of it and folks will just find something to hammer him on. Not enough charitable contributions? Check. Carrying over his losses? Check. I'm sure he has...

Not sure how you make this claim when he owns so many properties both domestic and internationally. Did the casino tank? Sure. So did most every other casino in NJ and they'll continue to tank as many states legalize gambling. Businessmen take risks. Sometimes they win, sometimes they lose...

Amen.....I'd bet some of our best friends were/are people we got into fights with when we were kids. And there was also consequences for stupid shit you said or did. We've all been there, took our lumps one way or another and moved on. We'd be out all day, didn't worry about stupid shit...

Cmd, folks offered you a lot of opinions and past precedent. Just wondering if you've changed your stance or have any follow-up.

Good video Scott and worth a listen for anyone that wants the historical precedent(s).

And as I mentioned earlier CMD, this wouldn't even be an issue had the Dems not done away with the filibuster. It forced both sides to cooperate and compromise. Looking back now, it's obvious why folks smarter than us inserted the filibuster into our system of legislation and that is to avoid...

Why do you make an statement that doesn't exist and then formulate your argument around that? I mean, we have a Jerry death watch thread. We've tried to recruit martyr pilots to fly his choppers and planes.....We've had bad thoughts about his yacht sinking.....I mean, how much lower do we have...

Great post Creeper but I disagree with your take on 2016. This wouldn't even be an issue if the Dems didn't do away with the filibuster. The threat of a filibuster forced the two sides to work together an compromise. But the Dems didn't want to do that. They just wanted to jam shit down...