Search results

I watched this hearing live and some of the most damning evidence that most folks overlook is the fact that the absentee ballots came in in sequential order. That's impossible. Unless they were all produced at the same time and came in all at once. And the witnesses didn't just give "stand...

Are referring to John Gill from Star Trek cannon? That's too funny because i was thinking the same thing. You're right....as time passes and no one reports any of these anomalies, the evidence gets destroyed, erased, deleted and covered up. That's the issue with these cases. The civil...

And there is additional damning testimony from witnesses in GA where she observed multiple duplicate and pristine ballots. None of them were folded. This is a partisan who has been working elections for years. The paper was also different.

And Lin Wood and Sydney Powell have requested that all the video be preserved BEFORE it was released to the public. There's evidence everywhere. It's not as simple as just putting this monstrosity together in a neat package wrapped in a bow. The civil suits allow for the preservation of...

Proof is the video and witness testimony by the hundreds. As I told you earlier, to get this through court will take time and Trump's strategy is separate from the criminal and civil court room actions.

For those like Dooms that can't put one and one together, let me help you. Multiple states stopped counting at the same time. Multiple states made Republican pole watchers leave the room. Multiple witnesses testified that, in different states, people came in the dead of night carrying boxes...

So people testified before the committee that this never happened but what these thieves didn't know id that there was video. Watch these clips:

So a courtroom will dictate your opinion of things you should see with your own eyes? You've got a strange way of formulating your opinions. I'm sure you believe OJ didn't do it.

For anyone that is listening to some of these hearing in the battleground states, the evidence is pretty striking and shocking. In Michigan yesterday, one of the numbers reported was that of the 80 (plus) year olds who received mail in ballots, 17,000 plus did vote and had corresponding...

There are none so blind as those who will not see........

Really? If you can't see how intoducing a voting manner that has been banned in most civilized societies due the high risk of fraud is different, then I don't know what to tell you.

It's really not a very good analogy Dooms. The President must protect the integrity of the election. Even now, we're still counting votes and it's been over a month. There's more at stake here then who will be the next President.

I've heard it too Yim, mostly when Republicans filled the vacant SCOTUS vacancy. But that's not courage. The ingenuity to plan out these elections by changing state laws through the courts and getting Republican governors to go along with it is insane. That's where Georgia is such a head...

Not sure what you're saying here Dooms. Trump will keep his job if the state legislatures come to grips with the fraud and pick the electorates. That would take a lot of courage but there are enough people coming forward and testifying before these state hearings about the fraud they witnessed...

Even 30% of Dems think something was up......even if the numbers are off, that's still very telling....

Everyone, including myself, wants the proverbial "smoking gun." I can tell you haven't read the lawsuits that were filed. There are very serious allegations of fraud that will require hearing, discovery, depositions, etc. These folks are doing the country a service by exposing Dominion and...

It's an issue with the US Constitution and the Elections Clause. It's a federal issue. Article 1 / Section 4 / Clause 1 The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at...

The end game is to have the states recognize their elections were compromised by mail in ballots and have the state legislatures pick the electorates. As I mentioned earlier, Trump's team has a valid legal and constitutional argument which the SCOTUS must address. Changes to the states...

They have cases in federal court. If a judge rules against them, they appeal, and visa versa, until it works its way to SCOTUS. They just had an appeals court rule against them in the Middle District of PA without hearing any evidence (which Trump's team requested an evidentiary hearing)...