Scot

Pro Bowler
Messages
14,693
Reaction score
5,996
The following was written by Cowboy staffer Mickey Spagnola

IRVING, Texas – What we learned from the next round of NFL playoffs, Volume II, heading into Sunday’s NFL Conference Championship games:

Three of the four winners, both NFC teams, Carolina and Arizona, along with Denver in the AFC, play with quarterbacks selected in the first round of the NFL Draft: Peyton Manning (1998), Carson Palmer (2003) and Cam Newton (2011). Of course, Tom Brady the lone exception (6th).

In fact, those three also just so happen to be the No. 1 selection in their respective drafts.

Three of the four winners scored at least 26 points in the divisional round of the playoffs: Carolina 31, New England 27 and Arizona 26.

That means five of the eight victories so far in this year’s playoffs have seen the winning team score at least 26 points.

And that is no exception. Last year nine of the 11 winners scored at least 26 points. And the year before that, 10 of the 11 winners scored at least 23 points, including Seattle putting 43 on Denver in Super Bowl XLVIII.

Imagine that, offense wins.

So as we continue with the Dallas Cowboys’ 2015 post-mortem, as the over-analyzation of 4-12 continues ad-nauseam – maybe the most disappointing season in club history from the standpoint of much expected, nothing realized – let’s get real.

Look, so much is being made of the Cowboys’ defensive frailties. About how they finished with a franchise-low 11 takeaways and set the franchise-low with just three fumble recoveries. That’s 20 fewer takeaways than in 2014, yes. Although, it’s not as if the Cowboys offense was doing anything with those takeaways, turning the 11 into just two touchdowns and two field goals since Rolando McClain just went ahead and returned his interception for a touchdown his own self.

Also, check this out: While the Cowboys gave up 374 points this year, an average of 23.4 points a game, they actually gave up just 1.4 points a game more than they did in the 12-4 season of 2014 (22.0). They actually held seven opponents to no more than 20 points, same as last year, and the defense would have held three more opponents to no more than 20 if not for takeaway returns and a kickoff return for touchdowns. In fact, the Cowboys gave up two fewer touchdowns this year (41) than they did last year (43).

Now would the team have liked better? Absolutely. But let’s just remember only three times all season did the Cowboys ever play with as much as a two-touchdown lead, and only once by more, leading Philadelphia, 20-3, in Game 2 after Brandon Weeden’s late fourth-quarter touchdown pass. Yep, the largest lead of the season.

So let’s not kid ourselves one bit.

The Cowboys failed miserably on offense, especially compared to the 2014, playoff season, so let’s not make more of this last-place finish in the NFC than it really is.

Last year the Cowboys scored 467 points, second most in club history, while averaging 29.2 a game. This year, only 275, nearly 200 less, the fewest since their 217 in 2002, averaging 17.2 a game.

Last year the Cowboys scored 56 touchdowns, matching the third most in club history. This year, just 26, my gosh the difference far greater than the amount they scored, actually matching the third fewest touchdowns scored in club history (2001-2002) and just three more than the club record-low of 23 set in the inaugural, 12-game 1960 season. That bad. Oh, and the second fewest? That would have been the 25 scored in the 1-15 season of 1989.

This would come as no surprise since the Cowboys were only able to score more than 20 points five times while doing so 10 times last year. And this with three of their five starting offensive linemen returning to next weekend’s Pro Bowl.

Now, there are a lot of harebrained theories floating around out there for this epic offensive falloff, as if the Cowboys pushed their offense in a barrel over Niagara Falls: No DeMarco Murray, even though the team average per rush this year was the same as it was last year with the NFL’s leading rusher, 4.6. Not enough rushing attempts, 100 fewer, or like six fewer a game, but remember with a lot fewer leads, too.

Or this notion that the Cowboys offense is solely designed for quarterback Tony Romo, and nobody else is capable of unearthing the secret, one tucked even deeper away when Pro Bowl receiver Dez Bryant wound up missing seven and a half games, and basically played all but one of the rest at far less than 100 percent.

Funny how fourth-year veteran Kellen Moore, in just his second NFL start, was able to pass for 435 yards in the season finale. In only two starts at the tail-end of the season, he threw four touchdown passes, one fewer than even Romo did in his four starts, and just three fewer than veterans Matt Cassel and Weeden did in 10 starts. Hmmm.

Or maybe, just maybe, and I know this is going to be hard for some to swallow, maybe Romo is just that good.

Let’s see, in the past two seasons Romo is 15-4 in his 19 starts. The others – Weeden, Cassel and Moore – just 1-12.

Let’s further see: Romo completed 70 percent of his passes, those others 61 percent. Romo threw for 4,589 yards in 19 starts, those others 3,096 in 13 starts while subbing out in three others.

Now brace yourselves, here come the biggies: Romo averaged 8.3 yards an attempt, had a TD/INT ratio of 39/16 and passer rating of 105.9. Those others averaged 6.9 yards an attempt, a TD/INT ratio of 14/17 and a rating of 76.8.

In deference to Terrell Owens, maybe these guys didn’t have the foresight to draw up plays on cocktail napkins with Jason Witten the night before games.

Oh, and when you can’t throw the ball, chances are running the ball is going to be like finishing off a hike atop one those Colorado Fourteeners: rocky. Once again, here is my long-standing stat: When the Cowboys fail to rush for more than 10 touchdowns in a season they have never finished with a winning record – nine losing now and three .500. And yep, they only had eight this season (16 last), stretching the drought to oh-fer-12.

So those in favor of blaming the offense say aye?

Come on now, let me hear ya.

Aye!

I rest my case.
 

cmd34

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,877
Reaction score
119
So as we continue with the Dallas Cowboys’ 2015 post-mortem, as the over-analyzation of 4-12 continues ad-nauseam

Yes, how dare we Mickey? We have some nerve.
 

onlyonenow

In the Rotation
Messages
526
Reaction score
1
its sad that Mickey is such a complete tool of Jerruh. Because he can actually now and then write well.
 
Messages
156
Reaction score
4
Offense wins when it gets opportunities, which actually come from the defense in the form of stops and turnovers. If you get two to five more drives each game your offense is going to look really good by comparison.
 

Scot

Pro Bowler
Messages
14,693
Reaction score
5,996
I've listened to his podcast all year and the only hostility he shows is when someone calls in and tries to blame the season on the coaching staff

Then he goes off on them saying that all the problems are due to player execution like dropped balls and bad throws and bad decisions

He is a Garret die hard for some reason that I can't figure out
 

cmd34

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,877
Reaction score
119
its sad that Mickey is such a complete tool of Jerruh. Because he can actually now and then write well.

Nope. Integrity is an essential ingredient of good journalism. Mickey has none.
 

Scot

Pro Bowler
Messages
14,693
Reaction score
5,996
It makes complete sense. If we didn't let the other teams score as often then we would have held more teams to under 20 points lol
 
Messages
2,278
Reaction score
53
I've listened to his podcast all year and the only hostility he shows is when someone calls in and tries to blame the season on the coaching staff

Then he goes off on them saying that all the problems are due to player execution like dropped balls and bad throws and bad decisions

He is a Garret die hard for some reason that I can't figure out

Long, long ago during the Campo Dark Age, when Mickey worked for the Ticket, I emailed him about the shit coaching and he responded with that same crap of "the players have to execute, not the coaches fault".

I responded to that with, "well then, the Cowboys need to get better players".

His response to that was, "who are you going to get?"

When I pointed out the absolute hypocrisy of his two talking points he never responded to me again. He is still trying to float that same shit nearly 20 years later. The man has zero credibility when it comes to the Cowboys. You can't on the one hand excuse the coaches by blaming the players then turn right around and argue against getting different players. Plus, I have never understood why these tools think that the "who you gonna get" argument has any validity whatsoever. The answer has always simply been "someone else" because there are always alternatives. I'd rather take my chances on a new guy who may turn out to suck than stick with a guy that has proven to suck.
 
Last edited:

onlyonenow

In the Rotation
Messages
526
Reaction score
1
Long, long ago during the Campo Dark Age, when Mickey worked for the Ticket, I emailed him about the shit coaching and he responded with that same crap of "the players have to execute, not the coaches fault".

I responded to that with, "well then, the Cowboys need to get better players".

His response to that was, "who are you going to get?"

When I pointed out the absolute hypocrisy of his two talking points he never responded to me again. He is still trying to float that same shit nearly 20 years later. The man has zero credibility when it comes to the Cowboys. You can't on the one hand excuse the coaches by blaming the players then turn right around and argue against getting different players. Plus, I have never understood why these tools think that the "who you gonna get" argument has any validity whatsoever. The answer has always simply been "someone else" because there are always alternatives. I'd rather take my chances on a new guy who may turn out to suck than stick with a guy that has proven to suck.


unfortunately they do have a point= there are a lot of coaches who WILL NOT COME HERE because of Jerruh.
 
Messages
4,604
Reaction score
0
It makes complete sense. If we didn't let the other teams score as often then we would have held more teams to under 20 points lol
Read it again. He says the DEFENSE would have held opponents to 20 points or less if the OFFENSE wouldn't have allowed return TD's and the special teams hadn't given up TD's, which has NOTHING to do with how many points the defense gave up.

Get it now?
 
Top Bottom