Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
PYONGYANG, North Korea — If there was ever any doubt about what happened to the only U.S. Navy ship that is being held by a foreign government, North Korea has cleared it up. It’s in Pyongyang. And it looks like it’s here to stay.

With a fresh coat of paint and a new home along the Pothong River, the USS Pueblo, a spy ship seized off North Korea’s east coast in the late 1960s, is expected to be unveiled this week as the centerpiece of a renovated war museum to commemorate what North Korea calls “Victory Day,” the 60th anniversary this Saturday of the signing of the armistice that ended the fighting in the Korean War.

The ship is North Korea’s greatest Cold War prize. The government hopes the Pueblo will be a potent symbol of how the country has stood up to the great power of the United States, once in an all-out ground war and now with its push to develop the nuclear weapons and sophisticated missiles it needs to threaten the U.S. mainland.

Many of the crew who served on the vessel, then spent 11 months in captivity in North Korea, want to bring the Pueblo home. Throughout its history, they argue, the Navy’s motto has been “don’t give up the ship.” The Pueblo, in fact, is still listed as a commissioned U.S. Navy vessel.

But with relations generally fluctuating in a narrow band between bad to dangerously bad, the United States has made little effort to get back its ship. At times, outsiders weren’t even sure where North Korea was keeping the ship or what it planned to do with it.

Requests for interviews with the captain of one of the North Korean ships involved in the attack were denied, and no officials would discuss their plans for it before the formal unveiling.

The Pueblo’s capture is a painful reminder of miscalculation and confusion, as well as the unresolved hostilities that keep the two countries in a seemingly permanent state of distrust and preparation for another clash, despite the truce that ended the 1950-1953 war.

Already more than 40 years old and only lightly armed so it wouldn’t look conspicuous or threatening as it carried out its intelligence missions, the USS Pueblo was attacked and easily captured on Jan. 23, 1968.

Surrounded by a half dozen enemy ships with MiG fighter jets providing air cover, the crew was unable to put up much of a fight. It scrambled to destroy intelligence materials, but soon discovered it wasn’t well prepared for even that.

A shredder aboard the Pueblo quickly became jammed with the piles of papers anxious crew members shoved into it. They tried burning the documents in waste baskets, but smoke quickly filled the cabins. And there were not enough weighted bags to toss all the secret material overboard.

One U.S. sailor was killed when the ship was strafed by machine gun fire and boarded. The remaining 82, including three injured, were taken prisoner. The North Koreans sailed the Pueblo to the port of Wonsan.

For the survivors, that’s when the real ordeal began.

“I got shot up in the original capture, so we were taken by bus and then train for an all-night journey to Pyongyang in North Korea, and then they put us in a place we called the barn,” said Robert Chicca of Bonita, Calif., a Marine Corps sergeant who served as a Korean linguist on the Pueblo. “We had fried turnips for breakfast, turnip soup for lunch, and fried turnips for dinner. ... There was never enough to eat, and personally, I lost about 60 pounds over there.”

Although the ship was conducting intelligence operations, crew members say that most of them had little useful information for the North Koreans. That, according to the crew, didn’t stop them from being beaten severely during interrogations.

“The Koreans basically told us, they put stuff in front of us, they said you were here, you were spying, you will be shot as spies,” said Earl Phares from Ontario, Calif., who was cleaning up after the noon meal in the galley when the attack began. “Everybody got the same amount of beatings in the beginning.”

North Korea said the ship had entered its territorial waters, though the U.S. maintained it was in international waters 15 miles off the nearest land.

The incident quickly escalated. The U.S., deeply embroiled in the Vietnam War, sent several aircraft carriers to the Sea of Japan and demanded the captives be released. Just days before the attack, North Korean commandos had launched an assassination attempt on South Korea’s President Park Chung-hee at his residence.

North Korea responded by putting members of the crew before cameras to confess publicly. The crew members planted defiant codes into forced letters of confession and extended their middle fingers in images sent around the world. That led to more beatings when the North Koreans figured out the gesture’s meaning.

On Dec. 21, 1968, Maj. Gen. Gilbert H. Woodward, the chief U.S. negotiator, signed a statement acknowledging that the Pueblo had “illegally intruded into the territorial waters of North Korea” and apologizing for “the grave acts committed by the U.S. ship against” North Korea. Both before and after, he read into the record a statement disavowing the confession.

The hostages were released across the Demilitarized Zone that divides the two Koreas two days before Christmas — 335 days after their capture.

The Navy considered a court-martial for the ship’s captain, Cmdr. Lloyd M. “Pete” Bucher, for letting the Pueblo fall into enemy hands without firing a shot and for failing to destroy much of the ship’s classified material. But he was never brought to trial. John H. Chafee, secretary of the Navy at the time, said Bucher and the other crew members “had suffered enough.”

To this day, members of the Pueblo crew say Bucher made the right decision, though years later his second-in-command publicly questioned Bucher’s decisions not to fight.

“It would have been nice to take out some of the guys, some of them, and maybe go down fighting, but it would have been total suicide,” said Phares. “We never thought anything would happen, and we weren’t supposed to create an international incident.”

In 2002, former U.S. Ambassador to South Korea Donald P. Gregg said a North Korean foreign ministry official hinted at a deal to return the Pueblo. But when he later visited Pyongyang, he said he was told the climate had changed and a return was no longer an option.

In January the next year, Colorado Sen. Ben Nighthorse Campbell reintroduced a resolution in Congress asking North Korea to return the ship. There has been no progress since, however, at least none that has been made public.

“The ship was named after Pueblo, Colorado, and they would have loved to have the ship back,” Chicca said. “It’s very disappointing to have it still there, and still being used as anti-American propaganda.”

The planned display of the ship by North Korea hangs over the heads of the crew members who have long campaigned for its return.

“I’ll never give up, but I don’t think it’s ever coming back,” Phares said. “It’s just unfortunate that we got put in that situation, and that the top brass blamed us, or blamed Bucher, for everything.”
 
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
The capture of this ship had a strong hand in us losing the Vietnam war.

Less than a year prior to this event, John Walker - a warrant officer in the Navy who had access to classified documents and crypto keys - walked into the Russian Embassy in Washington DC and offered to become a spy.

After being caught in 1985, he confessed to giving the Russians basically everything he could get his hands on.

The crypto is what we use to encrypt and and decrypt classified messages prior to transmission. In order to decode each message, you need the crytographic machine as well as the up to date key list. Those change periodically. Some daily, some weekly, monthly, etc.

Well, the Russians had the keylists, but none of the machines.

The USS Pueblo was a hot bed for cryptographic material - including virtually every then-used piece of machinery.

It is believed that the Russians pressed the North Koreans to capture the vessell, and that the NK's then turned most if not all the machines on board to the Russians.

And it is believed that the Russians were able to decode the messages sent by the US military and in turn provided critical information to the North Vietnamese during the Veit Nam war.

There were many bombing runs and missions that should've been very successful, but the North Vietnamese always seemed to be prepared. And no one in the Pentagon could figure out why.
 

Jon88

Pro Bowler
Messages
19,523
Reaction score
0
I guess that's why we armed the Taliban in Afghanistan during the 1980's in their war against Russia.

Payback's a bitch.
 

JBond

UDFA
Messages
2,667
Reaction score
2
The capture of this ship had a strong hand in us losing the Vietnam war.

Less than a year prior to this event, John Walker - a warrant officer in the Navy who had access to classified documents and crypto keys - walked into the Russian Embassy in Washington DC and offered to become a spy.

After being caught in 1985, he confessed to giving the Russians basically everything he could get his hands on.

The crypto is what we use to encrypt and and decrypt classified messages prior to transmission. In order to decode each message, you need the crytographic machine as well as the up to date key list. Those change periodically. Some daily, some weekly, monthly, etc.

Well, the Russians had the keylists, but none of the machines.

The USS Pueblo was a hot bed for cryptographic material - including virtually every then-used piece of machinery.

It is believed that the Russians pressed the North Koreans to capture the vessell, and that the NK's then turned most if not all the machines on board to the Russians.

And it is believed that the Russians were able to decode the messages sent by the US military and in turn provided critical information to the North Vietnamese during the Viet Nam war.

There were many bombing runs and missions that should've been very successful, but the North Vietnamese always seemed to be prepared. And no one in the Pentagon could figure out why.

Just a side note. We did not lose the Vietnam Conflict militarily. We won every major engagement. The pussy politicians after micromanaging the war, quit due to pressure from a bunch of leftists. The same leftists that are now running our entire government.

Anyway that was a interesting story regarding the Pueblo. That museum should be one of the first places we reduce to ashes in our next war with them.
 
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
Just a side note. We did not lose the Vietnam Conflict militarily. We won every major engagement. The pussy politicians after micromanaging the war, quit due to pressure from a bunch of leftists. The same leftists that are now running our entire government.

Dude... we should've destroyed them. We had more money, resoureces, better trained soldiers, better weapons, etc.
 

Jon88

Pro Bowler
Messages
19,523
Reaction score
0
We shouldn't have fought them in the first place. It was a pointless war that costed us over 50,000 servicemen and women.
 

Jon88

Pro Bowler
Messages
19,523
Reaction score
0
Exactly had no business being in that war

It's like starting a fight with a homeless person who lives in the woods. How exactly is he affecting you?

That's what those people were to us.
 

Bluenoser

In the Rotation
Messages
1,203
Reaction score
0
Just a side note. We did not lose the Vietnam Conflict militarily. We won every major engagement. The pussy politicians after micromanaging the war, quit due to pressure from a bunch of leftists. The same leftists that are now running our entire government.
You guys did lose the war though right? The US was supporting the South and the North won. Vietnam is such a shit hole though you could argue that because the North won they really lost. They would have been better off with the South winning.
 

Hoofbite

Draft Pick
Messages
4,231
Reaction score
0
Give JBond a break guys.

He's a Cowboys fan and has heard Jerry's BS a time or two. That means that his team never loses, they just beat themselves.

US didn't lose the Vietnam War, just beat themselves.
 

jnday

UDFA
Messages
2,680
Reaction score
0
That war was nothing more than a case of could of, should of would of. It taught a lesson that the US has struggled to learn. You shouldn't fight a half-ass war by limiting your full military capabilities. Go strong or don't go. These little shit hole countries should have been bombed till it looked like a glowing parking lot.
 

lons

UDFA
Messages
1,630
Reaction score
100
We've lost what? 1200 people in both wars since 02? For that amount of time we should have just wiped the Middle East clean of every single person that doesn't wipe their ass with toilet paper.
 

Jon88

Pro Bowler
Messages
19,523
Reaction score
0
We've lost what? 1200 people in both wars since 02? For that amount of time we should have just wiped the Middle East clean of every single person that doesn't wipe their ass with toilet paper.

We lost over 5,000 in Iraq.
 

Hoofbite

Draft Pick
Messages
4,231
Reaction score
0
Damn those international laws regarding killing every person, combatant or civilian.
 

lons

UDFA
Messages
1,630
Reaction score
100
Damn those international laws regarding killing every person, combatant or civilian.

My point was, for the length of time we've been in two wars the casualties are nothing to the Nam era losses and if you were to put that on the level of Nam we'd have pretty much have had to invade every Country over there to get to the 60k lost. Not that we should have...
 

Hoofbite

Draft Pick
Messages
4,231
Reaction score
0
My point was, for the length of time we've been in two wars the casualties are nothing to the Nam era losses and if you were to put that on the level of Nam we'd have pretty much have had to invade every Country over there to get to the 60k lost. Not that we should have...

Yeah, technology is a hell of a thing. Not sure where you're going with it.
 

JBond

UDFA
Messages
2,667
Reaction score
2
Give JBond a break guys.

US didn't lose the Vietnam War, just beat themselves.

Come on hoof. You know the real history. Despite having both hands tied the military managed to execute the politicians half-assed plan and never lost a major engagement. I agree the democrats were fools for getting involved. JFK and Johnson fucked up big time. After they insisted in inserting themselves in the name of containment they should have gone big or never gotten involved. You go to war to win and you win by crushing the other side. You do not win by having clowns hand picking targets. The rules of engagement were asinine.
 
Top Bottom