C

Cr122

Guest
Cowlishaw: If running game struggles, so will Tony Romo's passing game

06:00 PM CDT on Saturday, September 11, 2010

Column by TIM COWLISHAW / The Dallas Morning News

Column by TIM COWLISHAW / The Dallas Morning News | wtcowlishaw@dallasnews.com

Tim Cowlishaw
Archive | Blog | Bio | E-mail

Sure, Miles Austin is a wealthy young man now with $18 million in guaranteed money. What Cowboys fans really want to know is this:

Can he play left guard?

No one knew Kyle Kosier was so valuable until he missed time in the preseason. Fans didn't realize tackles Flozell Adams and Marc Colombo were anything more than figures to boo for false starts until one was let go and the other injured.

The Cowboys open the season Sunday night against Washington with Alex Barron, Doug Free and Montrae Holland in the lineup. In other words, they have offensive line issues that could easily impact the entire offense.

And yet, for the most part, that's no reason to think this team still can't serve as more than gracious hosts for Super Bowl XLV come February.

Look around the NFC.

The Super Bowl champion Saints put a whopping 14 points on the Superdome scoreboard Thursday night. And still that was enough to open defense of their title on the winning side because the Vikings answered with a big nine.

Check the rest of the Cowboys' competition for NFC supremacy. They're facing Donovan McNabb because the Eagles gave up on him. It will undoubtedly take time for McNabb to turn the Redskins into a fearsome offensive machine, if that happens at all this season.

And whether or not Philadelphia is correct in its evaluation of McNabb as a declining player, Kevin Kolb probably won't begin the season in Super Bowl form.

As for the only NFC team to win a playoff game each of the last two years – something you generally can't say about the Cardinals' franchise – Arizona won't be the same high-flying bunch until Derek Anderson makes fans forget Kurt Warner.

Let's just say that offensive problems abound in the pro game, particularly in the NFC.

Just having company won't lead the Cowboys out of their misery.

This was a team determined to show nothing in the preseason. Mission accomplished.

But you still have to wonder why, even if a team isn't game planning or anticipating opposing blitz packages, it can't run the ball with some efficiency. Neither Felix Jones nor Marion Barber had what could be considered a decent quarter of rushing. They combined to gain 45 yards on 21 carries.

The good news for them is that they ran wild on Washington in two games late last season. Barber was highly efficient, gaining 162 on 37 carries, while Jones added 107 on 20.

They will need whatever level of confidence that experience gives them because this is a new line and a new opponent. Coordinator Jim Haslett is converting the Redskins to the 3-4 defense.

We have no clue what role Albert Haynesworth will play in that defense because the Redskins don't even know themselves. Still, despite the Cowboys' rushing production, this is a defense that caused people problems late last season – Dallas scored all of 24 points in those two games.

If the Cowboys can't run with consistency, then we may see quarterback Tony Romo start 2010 the same way he finished last season.

Under siege.

The Vikings sacked him six times when the Cowboys were held to a field goal in their 34-3 playoff loss. It won't really matter whether this is a new Roy Williams or just how big and elusive Dez Bryant appears in his first professional game if the Cowboys can't block for Romo.

Showering Austin with Jerry Jones' millions won't pay off until Romo has time to set his feet and find him.

An offense that finished last season on a very low note has the chance to strike a new chord in 2010. Don't be surprised if they still sound slightly out of tune Sunday night.

• • •
 
C

Cr122

Guest
Yeah, it's pretty basic.

Run the football well and have an effective passing game.

You don't run the ball well, get used to the defense having their way with you.
 

MichaelWinicki

In the Rotation
Messages
782
Reaction score
0
Actually there's much less correlation between running game success/passing game success than what most believe.

Season after season, you'll see very good running teams that can't pass to save their lives and passing teams that can't run a lick.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
Actually there's much less correlation between running game success/passing game success than what most believe.

Season after season, you'll see very good running teams that can't pass to save their lives and passing teams that can't run a lick.

Wait. So an effective run game that causes safeties to creep up into the box won't help out a passing game?

Jesus Christ, Mike. Did they give you a lobotomy over there or what?
 

MichaelWinicki

In the Rotation
Messages
782
Reaction score
0
Wait. So an effective run game that causes safeties to creep up into the box won't help out a passing game?

Jesus Christ, Mike. Did they give you a lobotomy over there or what?

Sure you would like safeties to "cheat" towards the LOS, but like I posted previously every season you'll see teams that pass well and run poorly and visa versa.

Do some stat research and you'll see for yourself. :)
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
Sure you would like safeties to "cheat" towards the LOS, but like I posted previously every season you'll see teams that pass well and run poorly and visa versa.

Do some stat research and you'll see for yourself. :)

That has nothing to do with the run helping the pass and vice versa though.

Those teams that run well and struggle to pass would struggle even more without that run game.
 

MichaelWinicki

In the Rotation
Messages
782
Reaction score
0
That has nothing to do with the run helping the pass and vice versa though.

It does have nothing do with the run helping the pass or the pass helping the run.

Because one doesn't help or hurt the other to the degree that many think.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
It does have nothing do with the run helping the pass or the pass helping the run.

Because one doesn't help or hurt the other to the degree that many think.

I think that's incredibly naive.

Tell that to any coordinator in the league.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
I'm not sure you're echoing an argument they would make.

I don't see how I wouldn't be.

An effective run game forces the safeties to compensate. It opens up play action.

A potent passing attack will spread the defense out. Opening up running lanes.

The best offenses are the ones with balance. With the threat or a run or pass keeping the defense on it's heels.

Nobody said if you have a great running game that you'll automatically be able to throw it. Personnel comes into play. But it absolutely puts your passing game in a better situation to succeed than an ineffective running game.

Football 101.
 

MichaelWinicki

In the Rotation
Messages
782
Reaction score
0
Yeah Football 101.

2009...

The top five passing teams:

Houston
Indy
NE
NO
SD

And where did they rank in rushing the football?

Houston - 30th
Indy - 32nd
NE -12th
NO - 6th
SD -31st

Yep. Those devastating running attacks really "opened-up" the passing game.

And it wasn't a case of most of these teams getting a high average per carry either:

Houston 3.5 ypc
Indy 3.5 ypc
SD 3.3 ypc

You would think that even with safeties playing back and many times the defense playing in the nickel vs. these aggressive passing attacks that even a "Rashard Lee" kind of back would get well over 4 yards-per-carry.

Guess not.

And before you ask, it works the other way too...

The top 5 running teams:

NYJ
Tenn
Carolina
Minny
Balt

And where did they rank passing the football?

NYJ - 31st
Tenn - 23rd
Carolina - 27th
Minny - 8th
Baltimore - 18th

And it wasn't like NYJ, Tenn and Carolina were able to get a high ypa either. In a league where an 8.0 ypa would get you into the top 10, those three teams average 6.6 ypa or less.

So much for safeties "cheating" towards the LOS or defensive lineman playing the run first.

Maybe, just maybe, it comes down to the talent of the skill players participating in the running game or the skills of the players participating in the passing game IN ADDITION to each lineman's skill blocking for one type of play vs the other.

Running the balls vs passing the ball – different football tactics that do not cross influence as much as many think.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
You're still not getting it, Mike.

I'm not saying a great passing team will be a great running team. Personnel factors into that.

But take these Dallas Cowboys. They will be more effective running the football if the passing game is clicking. That is true everywhere. The run opens up the pass and vice versa.
 

MichaelWinicki

In the Rotation
Messages
782
Reaction score
0
You're still not getting it, Mike.

I'm not saying a great passing team will be a great running team. Personnel factors into that.

But take these Dallas Cowboys. They will be more effective running the football if the passing game is clicking. That is true everywhere. The run opens up the pass and vice versa.

Do I think there is some influence from one part of the offense to the other? Yes.

But it can't be assumed that one part of the offense would be sub-par based on the sub-par performance of the other.
 

MichaelWinicki

In the Rotation
Messages
782
Reaction score
0
Then you have cases where an offense sucks, not because it can't run, but because it can't do anything... Ugh.
 
Top Bottom