Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
Darren Woodson became the 21st member of the Cowboys Ring of Honor on Sunday. In his honor, the defense produced its first turnover in more than a month.


Is there any reason not to induct Tony Romo this Sunday against Philadelphia? The offense might feel emboldened to score a touchdown.

In fact, while there are news reports of Romo throwing on the side now in practice, I think a setback that holds him out until December would be enough to enshrine him in Canton, Ohio.

The longer fans go without seeing Romo, the closer to Staubach-Aikman status he climbs. Who's the last person to disappear and become this much more interesting?

Amelia Earhart? Elvis? Tupac?

(Just give me your age, I'll throw a reference at you.)

The Cowboys have been forced to play without Romo before, but they have never wheezed and sputtered quite like this. In fact, nobody really does.

Pittsburgh, Indianapolis, even Cleveland, have won games with backup quarterbacks this season. You could argue that the Jets and Washington, second-place teams at 4-3 and 3-4, respectively, have played all season with quarterbacks who were expected to be backups this summer.

It's not impossible. It's not a season-ender to lose your starter.

When Tom Brady was lost for 2008 in the season opener, the Patriots still posted an 11-5 record. I believe Matt Cassel was their quarterback.

The Cowboys were 6-9 without an injured Romo coming into this season. That record now sits at 6-14 as this team has settled into the NFC East basement with its inability to achieve even the most modest success without their leader.

As tight end Jason Witten said of Romo on Sunday, "There's no denying what kind of player he is, but we should still be able to go out and win games."

Or how about a game? Singular.

There is this general sense in the NFL that with 32 teams, no one has great backups. Steve Young doesn't wait patiently on the 49ers bench for something to happen. Craig Morton doesn't get taken with the fifth pick in the draft and then wait until his sixth season to grab the starting job (and get it then only because Don Meredith retired suddenly after the 1969 season).

We don't live in that era. The belief is that if you have to play your backup more than two to three weeks, you're finished anyway, so why overspend for a luxury that in many cases you won't use at all?

But we have seen the reverse of that this season. The Cowboys already have played five games without Romo. Had they figured out a way to win one of them -- just one -- and they have been tied or ahead in the fourth quarter in all but the New England game, they would be a half-game out of first in the East.

Instead, they have a five-game losing streak, and we keep shifting the floor on how far this team can fall and stay in the race in a weakened division.

Of course, Romo to the rescue is scheduled to begin in Miami in two weeks. Suddenly, those first two games -- (at Miami, Carolina on Thanksgiving) -- look more formidable than they did a month ago, not to mention the simple physical challenge Romo will face in playing so much football so quickly after two months of baking "crownies" or whatever he's been up to.

The falsehood is that all will be well when this team regains its quarterback. Do we really know that or even have reason to suspect it?

This was consistently an 8-8 team until it got an uncommon burst of production from DeMarco Murray in 2014. Joseph Randle not only didn't dominate this year, he lost his job here Tuesday. But even with Darren McFadden having taken over as the lead back, it's hard to see him duplicating the Murray role that was critical in limiting what Romo had to do from week to week.

On top of that, Dez Bryant also had a record-setting season with 16 touchdown catches in 2014. He hasn't thrown up the X since the 2014 season finale in Washington and has 60 receiving yards this season. You expect him to regain his role eventually, but receivers' production can fluctuate considerably from year to year.

And so we wait. Two more weeks and then Romo returns as the conquering hero with the expectation that he will deliver this team from whatever self-inflicted wounds it has incurred.

And you thought he was an MVP candidate in 2014.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
54,848
Reaction score
6,109
The O wasn't setting the world on fire with him either.

He only played 6 quarters, and basically half those were without Dez Bryant on the field and an OL that clearly wasn't ready due to a number of injuries.

If he had played every game, we'd no doubt be 6-1 IMO
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
54,848
Reaction score
6,109
Not with this system. As you mentioned, the WRs are running into coverage.

There's been plenty of plays where guys were open, but the QB hasn't even tried to make the throw. Something Sturm and Broaddus have both shown on film and still pics.

Cassel missed a number of plays, including two probable TDS last week
 

Doomsday

High Plains Drifter
Messages
21,399
Reaction score
3,794
Colon-saw said:
But even with Darren McFadden having taken over as the lead back, it's hard to see him duplicating the Murray role that was critical in limiting what Romo had to do from week to week.
There was never any intention of that this year. Because it was assumed Romo would be more healthy, back wise. That's the whole reason Murray was expendable. THEY DON'T WANT TO BE RUN-FIRST!
 

Sheik

All-Pro
Messages
24,809
Reaction score
5
The line is playing a whole hell of a lot better the last 3 or so games. They looked pretty average the first part of the year.
 

Doomsday

High Plains Drifter
Messages
21,399
Reaction score
3,794
The line is playing a whole hell of a lot better the last 3 or so games. They looked pretty average the first part of the year.
Collins. Brought nasty attitude.
 
Messages
2,329
Reaction score
11
Not with this system. As you mentioned, the WRs are running into coverage.

System. Finite set of routes in Jason's system that only occur depending on the position of the cb and the SS. Since it's literally the oldest scheme in the nfl, the years and years of game film from around 1980, show the repetitive tendencies of the 9 routes in certain coverages. Athleticism and speed allow certain success but really the success of the run game/play action is supposed to set free the WRs...or they will "run into coverage" every play. Generally the "open" players in Jason's scheme occur after the initial routes failed. Case in point where Broaddus is showing that Dez was open in the Seattle game: If the O-line just "needed to hold the blocking a little longer", the initial decoy crossing route failed (3.5 seconds) and Dez was then running to the space in coverage. I don't know how long this charade is going to go on with how pathetic the system is. Even the DC.com writers are begging for pics and crossing routes. Whitehead going in motion like he is and McFadden throwing a pass is also evidence that Jason's "only execution" philosophy is not enough any more to justify the failure. Williams and Streets are not strong or fast enough to get off their press coverage and yet somehow they go out on the filed for play after play and do nothing. How is that possible?
 

NoShame

UDFA
Messages
2,797
Reaction score
0
Romo might not fix ALL of our problems but he'll fix enough to get this team winning again
 

ThoughtExperiment

Quality Starter
Messages
9,906
Reaction score
3
The line is playing a whole hell of a lot better the last 3 or so games. They looked pretty average the first part of the year.
Yep. I think the effects of our candy ass camp were being felt the first few games. Now they've played enough actual games to get in shape and get in sync.
 
Messages
3,455
Reaction score
0
If the Cowboys are still turning the ball over and not getting turnovers, Romo coming back won’t matter.
 
Top Bottom